Typo in the New York Times
There’s a typo in one of today’s NYT Editorials, California’s Condom Bill:

You’d think that a newpaper like the New York Times could devote staff to proofreading articles before publication, but I guess not. Even my little would have caught this 1-letter-off mistake.
This entry was posted on Monday, September 4th, 2006 at 12:36 pm and is tagged with newpaper, nyt, new york times, condom, editorials, mistake. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback.
One Response to 'Typo in the New York Times'
Leave a Reply
Please take time to enjoy the archives: June 2008 (2) May 2008 (1) April 2008 (1) February 2008 (1) January 2008 (3) October 2007 (2) September 2007 (1) August 2007 (3) July 2007 (4) June 2007 (3) May 2007 (2) April 2007 (5) March 2007 (3) February 2007 (3) January 2007 (1) December 2006 (3) November 2006 (4) October 2006 (1) September 2006 (3) August 2006 (2) February 2006 (3) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (3) November 2005 (2) October 2005 (4) September 2005 (1) August 2005 (5) July 2005 (4) June 2005 (1) May 2005 (3) April 2005 (8) March 2005 (8) February 2005 (8) January 2005 (11) December 2004 (6) November 2004 (6)
Fresh, related resources:
- So Who Really Is The Best Offensive Player In The Country?
In 1989 I had just moved to New York City and I didn?t know anyone. One night I had nothing to do and no one to do it with so I decided to take in a Ranger game at Madison Square Garden. As most people know I?m not even a casual hockey ... - News and Notes (or "Jason wants to write again")
All I ever noticed is a guy with midwest values living in the New York. I contend that Midwest values never leave you. Thanks for the entertainment lo these many years, Will, and good luck in the future. Blackhawks sign two of the top ... - How To Read Three Gettysburg Books At Once
While this might be true to some extent in some organizations (see Sickles? Excelsior Brigade from New York, for instance), for the vast majority it was not. Some regiments had seen combat at First Bull Run, others had been called up in ... - Does the Constitution protect a substantive right to hunt?
[UPDATE: I have corrected a typo in the last paragraph. But let me borrow from a point made by University of Pennsylvania Professor of Law Paul Robinson in an op-ed in yesterday's New York Times, "Shoot to Stun," that suggests that a ... - Thanks Dad!
... a big fan of Rush and he's...well, because a big liberal himself, disavowing that he gave me the book at all (I still have the copy, Dad!). For the fans of El Rushbo, all 20 million of us, there's a great writeup in the New York Times.
on October 25th, 2006 at 9:41 am
“Even my little would have caught this 1-letter-off mistake.”
Now that’s ironic!