Books Blog: English Literature & Linguistics


Hegel & Tragedy

Posted in Classics by Elliott Back on September 18th, 2006. [Del.icio.us]

If you’ve ever wondered what Hegelian Tragedy is, look no further:

“The tragedy in the realm of the ethical is to fall between the spell of two equal moral imperatives; thus the subject is constrained by the inextricable fate of failure no matter which he might choose.”

So I paraphrase this–discuss in comments, please.

This entry was posted on Monday, September 18th, 2006 at 9:39 pm and is tagged with , , , , , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback.

3 Responses to 'Hegel & Tragedy'

  1. Eric Back said:

    on September 23rd, 2006 at 11:15 pm

    And is his resolution a transcendent synthesis?

  2. david gordon bain said:

    on July 5th, 2008 at 6:51 pm

    “The tragedy in the realm of the ethical is to fall between the spell of two equal moral imperatives; thus the subject is constrained by the inextricable fate of failure no matter which he might choose.”

    Unless a creative synthesis can be arrived at that circumvents the prospective tragedy on either or both ends of the apparent paradox/ impasse.

    david gordon bain, author of dgb philosophy

  3. david gordon bain said:

    on August 11th, 2008 at 7:25 pm

    Step outside the realm of the ethical — or at least partly — and you have sufficient room for an even greater human tragedy — whether you choose to call it an ancient Greek tragedy as expounded on later by Nietzsche with a strong Hegelian influence or you choose to believe that these are all simply different archetype examples of what is an inherent division or contradiction in the human psyche — specifically the ethical vs. the unethical, the moral vs. immoral, the narcissistic vs. the anti-narcissistic…

    Here the moral imperative — or shall I say dilemma — is simply this: to transgress or not to transgress; to be selfish or to restrain myself on the grounds that my behavior could either hurt somebody else, particularly someone I care deeply about, and/or in the end, it could hurt me more than the simple adventure into unbridled pleasure is worth…

    To finish with a Shakespearean flourish — that is the question.

    There is no template answer.

    As Kierkegaard woud say: either/or.

    It’s your life, your decision, your accountability — both to yourself and others. Self-assertiveness, passion, and compassion for others are all important. Choose.

    – david gordon bain, Aug. 11th, 2008.

Leave a Reply