<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Books Blog &#187; Listmania</title>
	<atom:link href="http://books.elliottback.com/category/listmania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://books.elliottback.com</link>
	<description>English Literature &#038; Linguistics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Harry Potter Sequels in the Works</title>
		<link>http://books.elliottback.com/harry-potter-sequels-in-the-works/</link>
		<comments>http://books.elliottback.com/harry-potter-sequels-in-the-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listmania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://books.elliottback.com/archives/2007/07/23/harry-potter-sequels-in-the-works/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After selling 8.3 million copies in the US in just 24 hours, Harry Potter 7 is billed as the &#8220;the seventh and final book in J.K. Rowling&#8217;s magical series.&#8221;  We, however, having read the novel, could not agree less with J.K. Rowling and her publisher Scholastic&#8217;s publicity-drumming campaign of artificial supply restriction.  For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After selling 8.3 million copies in the US in just 24 hours, Harry Potter 7 is billed as the &#8220;the seventh and final book in J.K. Rowling&#8217;s magical series.&#8221;  We, however, having read the novel, could not agree less with J.K. Rowling and her publisher Scholastic&#8217;s publicity-drumming campaign of artificial supply restriction.  For we believe that there will be more Harry Potter novels in the future.</p>
<p>Now, if you haven&#8217;t finished the series yet, go away because we might ruin the ending!</p>
<p><img id="image138" src="http://books.elliottback.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/harry-potter-covers.jpg" alt="harry-potter-covers.jpg" /><br />
<small>A mashup of HP covers</small></p>
<p>There are two reasons that an author continues a series.  One is the fun of writing the characters he&#8217;s dreamed into life.  The other is money.  For JK Rowling, Harry Potter offers her both opportunities, a temptation that we believe will be too hard to resist.</p>
<p>One of the Guardian Book blogs argues the <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/07/potters_predictable_magic.html">financial point</a> indirectly.  They claim that over time the Harry Potter series will generate decreasingly exponential interest, and thus revenue.  They hold out for a bright spot, but it&#8217;s true that Harry Potter is a series of big bangs and a short &#8220;long tail.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>The real indicator</strong> is that Harry Potter is <strong>still alive</strong> at the end of HP7.  That last chapter, 19 years in the future, indicates that the world of Muggles and Magic still exists in basically the form it had before Voldemort emerged.  The whole point of the Harry Potter series is a fight against evil, and once that evil is vanquished&#8211;as it is in HP7 without lasting consequence&#8211;the world returns to normal, fertile grounds for a sequel.  After all, why introduce us to Harry and Ginny&#8217;s spawn unless you plan to develop them in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://books.elliottback.com/harry-potter-sequels-in-the-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contronyms List</title>
		<link>http://books.elliottback.com/contronyms-list/</link>
		<comments>http://books.elliottback.com/contronyms-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listmania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://books.elliottback.com/archives/2007/04/21/contronyms-list/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A contronym or antagonym is defined as a word which is in itself its own antonym.  They are special cases of homographs, different words which share the same spelling.  Rinkworks has a long list of them, some highlights of which I will share here with you:

apology &#8211; admission of fault in what you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A contronym or antagonym is defined as a word which is in itself its own antonym.  They are special cases of homographs, different words which share the same spelling.  Rinkworks has a <a href="http://rinkworks.com/words/contronyms.shtml">long list of them</a>, some highlights of which I will share here with you:</p>
<ol>
<li><em>apology</em> &#8211; admission of fault in what you think, say, or do; formal defense of what you think, say, or do</li>
<li><em>dust</em> &#8211; add fine particles, remove fine particles</li>
<li><em>oversight</em> &#8211; error, care</li>
<li><em>pitted</em> &#8211; with the pit in, with the pit removed</li>
<li><em>rent</em> &#8211; buy use of, sell use of</li>
<li><em>table</em> &#8211; propose (in the United Kingdom), set aside (in the United States)</li>
</ol>
<p>There are doubtlessly many many more out there, so leave tons of comments for us in the hopes of acquiring more of these beautiful words!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://books.elliottback.com/contronyms-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wordie: Social Words</title>
		<link>http://books.elliottback.com/wordie-social-words/</link>
		<comments>http://books.elliottback.com/wordie-social-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listmania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://books.elliottback.com/archives/2006/12/13/wordie-social-words/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wordie goes by the tagline &#8220;Like Flickr, but without the photos&#8221; but it&#8217;s much more than that.  Until you&#8217;ve tried it out, you&#8217;d never believe social word-listing could be so fun.  Like shadenfreude?  So do 127 other people, right now.  The interface is clear and intuitive; you make lists of words.  Each word has its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordie goes by the tagline &#8220;Like Flickr, but without the photos&#8221; but it&#8217;s much more than that.  Until you&#8217;ve tried it out, you&#8217;d never believe social word-listing could be so fun.  Like <strong>shadenfreude</strong>?  So do 127 other people, right now.  The interface is clear and intuitive; you make lists of words.  Each word has its own permanent page, with comments, and lists the people who like that word.  You spend time trolling user lists, hunting words related to the ones you like.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what the interface looks like:</p>
<p><img id="image106" alt="wordie.jpg" src="http://books.elliottback.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/wordie.jpg" /></p>
<p>If you want to try it out, the <a href="http://wordie.org/">Wordie homepage</a>, <a href="http://wordie.org/people/elliottback">my userpage</a>, or my <a href="http://wordie.org/people/feed/elliottback?wl=1472">word list feed</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://books.elliottback.com/wordie-social-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atheist Quotes Site</title>
		<link>http://books.elliottback.com/atheist-quotes-site/</link>
		<comments>http://books.elliottback.com/atheist-quotes-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Listmania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://books.elliottback.com/archives/2006/08/02/atheist-quotes-site/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re an athiest or interested in athiesm, Chris has a digg-like quotes site:
When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realised that the Lord doesn&#8217;t work that way so I stole one and asked Him to forgive me.
Emo Phillips
Here&#8217;s another gem:
Blind faith is an ironic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re an athiest or interested in athiesm, Chris has a digg-like quotes site:</p>
<blockquote><p>When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realised that the Lord doesn&#8217;t work that way so I stole one and asked Him to forgive me.</p>
<p>Emo Phillips</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s another gem:</p>
<blockquote><p>Blind faith is an ironic gift to return to the Creator of human intelligence.</p>
<p>Unknown</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://books.elliottback.com/atheist-quotes-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some words mean one thing, others mean yet another!</title>
		<link>http://books.elliottback.com/some-words-mean-one-thing-others-mean-yet-another/</link>
		<comments>http://books.elliottback.com/some-words-mean-one-thing-others-mean-yet-another/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Listmania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Melanie Spiller wonders why some words have one meaning, while others have yet another, for sets of very similar words.  She gives definitions, but I&#8217;m going to bring out the derivations from the OED:
Adapt v. Adopt:
Adapt is from the latin ad + aptare, to fit for yourself.  Adopt comes from latin ad optare, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.officezealot.com/spiller/archive/2005/02/22/4186.aspx">Melanie Spiller</a> wonders why some words have one meaning, while others have yet another, for sets of very similar words.  She gives definitions, but I&#8217;m going to bring out the derivations from the OED:</p>
<p><em>Adapt v. Adopt:</em></p>
<p>Adapt is from the latin <em>ad + aptare</em>, to fit for yourself.  Adopt comes from latin <em>ad optare</em>, to choose for yourself.  The common prefix is now understandable, and the difference is in the &#8220;apt&#8221; or &#8220;opt,&#8221; both of which now stand on their own.</p>
<p><em>Accede v. Exceed:</em></p>
<p>Accede is from the latin <em>ad + cedere</em>, to move on.  Exceed is from the latin <em>ex + cedere</em>, to move [go] out.  This time, the words differ by prefix rather than suffix, one bringing something in, the other moving out.</p>
<p><em>Infamous v. Notorious:</em></p>
<p>Infamous is from the latin word famosus, for fame.  Notorious is from classical latin, notoria&#8211;a written notice informing a crime.  Thus, the two are basically indistinguishable, though have come to have slightly different connotations in modern form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://books.elliottback.com/some-words-mean-one-thing-others-mean-yet-another/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>English 354: British Modernist Novel</title>
		<link>http://books.elliottback.com/english-354-british-modernist-novel/</link>
		<comments>http://books.elliottback.com/english-354-british-modernist-novel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Listmania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This semester I&#8217;m taking English 354: British Modernist Novel at Cornell University.  Here&#8217;s the course description:
Virginia Woolf observed, &#8220;in or about December, 1910, human character changed.&#8221; In her (tongue-in-cheek) statement, the early twentieth century inaugurated a very different understanding of character, and a consequent shift in the emphasis of the novel. The class reads [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This semester I&#8217;m taking English 354: British Modernist Novel at Cornell University.  Here&#8217;s the course description:</p>
<blockquote><p>Virginia Woolf observed, &#8220;in or about December, 1910, human character changed.&#8221; In her (tongue-in-cheek) statement, the early twentieth century inaugurated a very different understanding of character, and a consequent shift in the emphasis of the novel. The class reads novels by Woolf, E. M. Forster, D. H. Lawrence, Ford Madox Ford, Jean Rhys, and Rebecca West, along with critical and theoretical writings by these novelists. Writing requirements include a weekly post to the class e-list and two ten to twelve page papers.</p></blockquote>
<p>For the class, we&#8217;ll be reading the following books:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0679409955/elliottback-20"><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0679409955.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.gif"></a> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393311465/elliottback-20"><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0393311465.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"></a> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0316926116/elliottback-20"><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0316926116.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"></a> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/014118065X/elliottback-20"><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/014118065X.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"></a> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0679406654/elliottback-20"><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0679406654.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.gif"></a> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0451526651/elliottback-20"><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0451526651.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"></a> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0679406689/elliottback-20"><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0679406689.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.gif"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://books.elliottback.com/english-354-british-modernist-novel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christmas Geek Books</title>
		<link>http://books.elliottback.com/christmas-geek-books/</link>
		<comments>http://books.elliottback.com/christmas-geek-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Listmania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wired News has a story on the delightful assortment of geeky books available this holiday season.  Among the highlights are Spam Kings, and in-depth look at the lives of notorious spammers &#8220;Dr. Fatburn, Terri Tickle, Mad Pierre and the Spam King himself &#8212; Davis Hawke.&#8221;  Also up on the plate is Tangent, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wired News has a <a href="http://www.wired.com/news/holidays/0,1882,65965,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_4">story</a> on the delightful assortment of geeky books available this holiday season.  Among the highlights are <a href="http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/spamkings/index.html">Spam Kings</a>, and in-depth look at the lives of notorious spammers &#8220;Dr. Fatburn, Terri Tickle, Mad Pierre and the Spam King himself &#8212; Davis Hawke.&#8221;  Also up on the plate is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1589612779/qid=1099515752/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-9764519-9107223?v=glance&#038;s=books">Tangent</a>, a hacker thriller about a freelance network security expert named Ash.</p>
<p>Of course, if this isn&#8217;t your kind of thing, you can always go with Amazon&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/zg/-/02/book/ref=pd_zg_pg_l/002-9342095-7136052">popular gifts in books</a>, and buy your family another <em>Davinci Code</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://books.elliottback.com/christmas-geek-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 1000 Books</title>
		<link>http://books.elliottback.com/top-1000-books/</link>
		<comments>http://books.elliottback.com/top-1000-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Listmania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OCLC has posted a list of what they claim are the top 1000 books held by their network of libraries.  The top ten:

Census
Bible
Mother Goose
Divine Comedy
Odyssey
Iliad
Huckleberry Finn
Hamlet
Alice&#8217;s Adventures in Wonderland
Lord of the Rings

I have to say that they&#8217;re all excellent resources&#8211;and that I&#8217;ve read all of them.  The first modern work is &#8220;Garfield&#8221; at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OCLC has <a href="http://www.oclc.org/research/top1000/complete.htm">posted</a> a list of what they claim are the <strong>top 1000 </strong>books held by their network of libraries.  The top ten:</p>
<ol>
<li>Census</li>
<li>Bible</li>
<li>Mother Goose</li>
<li>Divine Comedy</li>
<li>Odyssey</li>
<li>Iliad</li>
<li>Huckleberry Finn</li>
<li>Hamlet</li>
<li>Alice&#8217;s Adventures in Wonderland</li>
<li>Lord of the Rings</li>
</ol>
<p>I have to say that they&#8217;re all excellent resources&#8211;and that I&#8217;ve read all of them.  The first modern work is &#8220;Garfield&#8221; at #18, followed by &#8220;Carmen&#8221; at #66, &#8220;Peanuts&#8221; at #70, and &#8220;Doonesbury&#8221; at #80.  &#8220;Harry Potter and the Philosopher&#8217;s Stone&#8221; sadly lies at #256.</p>
<p>They also have a list of top <a href="http://www.oclc.org/research/top1000/banned.htm">banned books</a>, of which I will reproduce the top ten modern <strong>literary scandals</strong>:</p>
<ol>
<li>Bible</li>
<li>Huckleberry Finn</li>
<li>Don Quixote</li>
<li>Koran</li>
<li>Arabian Nights</li>
<li>Tom Sawyer</li>
<li>Gulliver&#8217;s Travels</li>
<li>Canterbury Tales</li>
<li>Scarlet Letter</li>
<li>Leaves of Grass</li>
</ol>
<p>Of course, these are now classics&#8211;and Mark Twain gets his name in twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://books.elliottback.com/top-1000-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
